Morons of the Internet: Medusa Magazine (Part 3)

This is the segment where I scour my favourite forums around the internet and find some particularly interesting articles about current affairs told in the words of my favourite human beings.

In this edition we return to those idiots at Medusa Magazine. If you think you've seen the worst of them so far then get ready for this one. Let's see how they tackle the controversial subjects of abortions and race. Seriously, it's worse than you could ever possibly imagine.
_______________________________________________________________________________
https://medusamagazine.com/beyond-pro-choice-the-solution-to-white-supremacy-is-white-abortion
_______________________________________________________________________________

Jesus, I hate those white families. Why can't we all live in a proper progressive society where black families are the norm? Say like Uganda, where homosexuality is illegal. Still, I bet that's because of those white families at it again. Actually to be fair banning homosexuality is far more progressive than instigating a cull on white fetuses. This whole paragraph is just a reductive argument from a historical perspective. Why should the sins of previous generations be repaid by forcefully killing white children in this day and age? You're creating the very problem you want to eradicate. Even more importantly I hope you realise that by instigating this genocide you won't rewrite the history of slavery, rather you will just become another evil pawn served up as a lesson to warn future generations. Maybe you too will have angry feminist bloggers whinging about your contributions to the world in 200 years time. That's of course assuming anyone takes you up on this barbaric plot.

Since when the fuck were the Native Americans egalitarian? In my funny little world I thought they operated under Chiefdom, which is quite the antithesis of egalitarianism. And don't think that this idea of egalitarianism traveled to the south either. The Mayans looted other city states and executed their warriors for social status. But yeah, Native Americans were definitely all about egalitarianism.

I just don't know where the argument is here. It's just random nonsense that vaguely resembles rudimentary identity politics. I know we're in a discussion over eugenics and genocide, but I still expected someone who advocated those things to be at least partially competent. I'm even more surprised by the hypocrisy of simultaneously condemning and supporting a racial genocide. Essentially this argument boils down to the realisation that eugenics is terrible, but that's because we haven't tried it a certain way.

Even I as a Brit have a better comprehension of the American constitution than this idiot. Just because something is constitutional doesn't make it an inherently evil thing. At one point in time these white men may well have advocated for slavery, which funnily enough was amended from the constitution, so there is a way around it. Today however these white men have given you the right to post this on the internet without fear of persecution. Okay maybe this article wasn't the best evidence as to why freedom of speech is a good thing, but even when faced with shit like this freedom of speech is still amazing. I still just don't understand how you can make the mental leap between the signing of a constitution hundreds of years ago to the struggles of African Americans today. Unlike what you claim all citizens of America profit from this constitution, irrespective of their race. If you have any qualms with this statement I suggest you give me some examples instead of some vague and slanderous bullshit. The rest of that paragraph is more identity politics gone sour. It's worrying to think that people do genuinely have this thought process, and that process can be seen as progressive.

Yeah, I might need some evidence to believe your claim that the choice element of abortions is dependent on race. If there's so many roadblocks then it should be really fucking easy to name at least one, but you can't even manage that. You say this system of white supremacy has been proven to not act impartially towards all women, yet funnily enough there is no evidence to suggest this either. In fact the statistics show that a disproportionately high number of black women are having abortions. If you're going to instigate genocide you might at least need some fucking solid evidence that isn't based on flat out lies. That 'if' by the way is doing a lot of work in that last sentence. And how the fuck are abortions ableist? How the fuck do you get to these conclusions? Stop shoehorning keywords into arguments where they don't belong.

Jesus, it's like listening to the love child of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler. In fact funnily enough I may have seen these words before. All you need to do is substitute the word 'white' for 'untermensch' and you have a frighteningly similar scenario to a certain infamous historical genocide. I like how white women giving birth to white kids is now a choice, like you can pick and mix skin colour whenever you decide to have a baby. You are aware that half of the mother's genes go into the baby? Not only are we going for genocide, but designer babies as well. Does this writer know the meaning of the word 'ethical'?

I just love how it's white people at fault for the disproportionate single motherhood rate in the black community. Any possible wrongdoing in the world just has to be caused by white people according to this idiot. How about instead of trying to kill people off we should instead become decent human beings? But no, we can't be expecting black fathers to stop being criminals, that's an insane request. No, kill all white people instead; much more rational.

I've also spotted a massive flaw in your argument, apart from say the murdering and all that. Why would you want white women to become the guardians of black children? Surely these are the people you're trying to kill because there's a risk of contaminating the racially pure African Americans with toxic white culture. And in any case, if you decide to kill a whole race, you can't then ask them for aid. Are you now suggesting that people of colour have the magical ability to transform into lighter skinned individuals to help restock those aiding white folk? I can tell you as someone who knows a thing or two about differentiation within species that this ability to change race aint gonna fix itself in a population in just one generation, or ever for that matter.

The final conclusions makes absolutely zero fucking sense, as you claim that white supremacy is crushed. Well why the fuck do you want to murder white children then? The thing is you provide no evidence that this white supremacy scourge is actually harmful, only that we should cure this apparent problem by murdering people. Murdering people for no reason. This is Americanised feminism at its best. Tell me, how would this system work in Malawi? Is that country suffering from white supremacy? 

What the actual fuck is this article? I've never been a fan of third wave feminism, but now some of them are advocating genocide. That's more fucked up than my meager words can describe. Instead of promoting women's rights we're now wanting to murder a whole race based on the actions of those who lived centuries ago. Maybe instead of just helping people of colour white women could also go the extra distance and start burning books by white authors, and then smashing up any white owned businesses. If you're really keen on this idea why don't you round up all the white babies, put them in a camp, and then gas them all? Just a little suggestion, because apparently claiming you want to kill all white people is perfectly fine now. It's absolutely not racist at all. The only person that should ever have been aborted is this writer.